You done good folks. The original three projects were funded amazingly quickly. But don't worry if you didn't get a chance to offload some of those dollars burning a hole in your pockets. DrugMonkey has more for you to fund! Get to it. For the kids.
Archive for the 'Life' category
If you've been looking for some tangible way to support the people of Ferguson, Missouri, head on over to DrugMonkey's and check out the Donors Choose options. For those that don't know, Donors Choose is a non-profit that partners with school teachers to raise money so they can buy stuff for their classrooms. Ferguson is classified as a high poverty area, so the teachers there need such exotic stuff as binders and paper. That's right, the kids don't have access to enough paper. You know you can spare a few. Go give.
When reviewers don't understand what it is you've written.
Nine times out of ten it's because you just haven't done a good enough job explaining it.
The tenth time it's because the reviewers are lobotomized cretins who've made ERRORS OF FACT!!!!!11!1!1!!!!!1!!!!!!!!!!
And you just haven't done a good enough job explaining it.
We had something great. It really was. Great. And productive!
I didn't pay attention like I should have. I didn't do those little things. I became... complacent.
I'm... I'm seeing different people.
You should too.
Stop listing me as a fucking preferred reviewer!
There's a lot of advice that can be given on surviving your tenure track years. The single most important IMNSHO is to learn how and when to say...
Junior faculty often have a hard time with this. They worry that saying no too often will make them look like poor colleagues and hurt their tenure chances. Certainly saying no to everything will do that. But saying yes to everything will also hurt your tenure odds. You won't have enough time to work on all that other stuff (grants, papers, teaching, more grants, more papers, more teaching, etc.).
And yet, junior folk will be asked to perform service (sit on committees etc.).* Especially if they're women. Especially if they're people of color. And if you're a woman of color? You'll be asked to serve on every imaginable committee.
How much is enough, how do you choose which things to do, and how do you say no to everything else?
In terms of how much is enough, ask. Often. Find yourself a senior faculty mentor if you don't already have one.** Ask them. Ask your chair. Do some digging and try to find out how much service work recently tenured folks did. It's really not hard to get ahold of people's cv's - they're often posted online. Or you could simply ask them.
What you choose to do is largely up to you. Yes, there will be those occasions when your chair/dean/senior person will ask you to sit on a certain committee because "it will be good for you"/"you're the right person"/they just need a warm body and everyone else said no. But you really do have a lot of control here. Say yes to those things that you care about and/or you think are important.
How do you say no? That's actually much easier than you might initially think. "I would, but I've already agreed to do x, y, and z." "That sounds like a great opportunity, but unfortunately it overlaps with [insert essential task(s) here]." "My mentor thinks I'm already doing enough/too much service and has told me to say no to everything else." *** Even "The tenure clock is ticking too quickly, I don't feel I have enough publications and/or funding, so I'm going to have to decline."
Yes, they're going to try to guilt/shame/beat you into doing things you don't want to and/or shouldn't be doing. Be strong. And polite. But still say no. Especially if you think what you're being asked to do is not suitable for someone without tenure.
Learn to say no. You'll thank me.
* I talk about service/committees here for simplicity. Learning how and when to say no is useful for many other things you'll encounter on the TT (e.g. unwanted collaborators).
** I cannot stress how important this is to your survival of the TT. Find someone who will be completely honest with you. Who will have your back if necessary. It's nice if their work is related to yours, but that's not as important as the previous two criteria. Really.
*** A good mentor will do this for you. And will take the heat.
Administrators that think adjunct faculty are a good idea.
Dinosaur graybeards who maintain the status quo.
Faculty who haven't updated their teaching in fifteen years.
Faculty who won't admit academia and the research funding situation have changed dramatically, and continue to do so rapidly.
Faculty who only train future faculty.
Faculty who treat department staff like dirt.
Faculty who treat their lab personnel like dirt.
Postdocs who think they've got it all figured out.
Grad students who think a PhD is a given.
The third reviewer.
I've barely scratched the surface with the above. Go hog wild in the comments.
People who drive in the left lane on the highway at or below the speed of people driving in the right lane.
People who hold prolonged conversations in front of the coffee pot.
People who get to the front of a long line at the coffee shop/food place and then take their time deciding what to order.
People who don't use turn signals.
People who take carry on bags on board the plane when the bags clearly aren't going to fit anywhere.
People who reply to listserv emails asking to unsubscribe.
People who reply to people who reply to listserv emails asking to unsubscribe.
Feel free to add you own in the comments. A version of this especially for academia is coming soon, so you may want to hold off on relevant comments until then.
NSF is big on promoting diversity. It's expected in the broader impacts of proposals. It's a big part of their CAREER awards. It's a major thrust of their REU programs. The NSF really wants its funded investigators to play a role in making STEM a much more diverse enterprise.
But then they go and do this...
[UPDATE] If you would like to nominate someone - and more nominations is one way to overcome this - here's the NSFs web page on the award.
So this link to a Mother Jones article on Ethan Perlstein and his "postdocalypse" went through my twit feed this morning. I'm not going to discuss the content here.*
Look at the stock photo at the top of the article. Clearly meant to be an MD. For an article about PhDs.
Really, Mother Jones? Really? That's the best you could come up with?
* Feel free to have at it in the comments if you like.
Since posting this, Elsevier has responded that the images will be removed. Hopefully they will also put mechanisms in place to ensure this doesn't occur again.
What the fuck?!?!?
Who the hell at the journal, publisher (I'm looking at you Elsevier), and European Proteomics Association thinks this is okay?
Stop it. And get rid of those images.
[UPDATE] The Lab and Field has already posted on this. Also, author of those two papers gave this reply to a complaint from @madamscientist.