Archive for the 'Cannabis' category

Because nothing is more compassionate and caring than half-nekkid chicks

Nov 28 2011 Published by under Cannabis, Medicine and Law

From the Sacramento Bee:

At the "Kush Expo Medical Marijuana Show" in Anaheim this month, the 420 Nurses were joined by the Ganja Juice girls and a bikini troupe for an Orange County dispensary sponsoring the Expo's "Hot Kush Girl" contest. A whooping, largely male throng cheered as 21 women competed for signature edition bongs and cash prizes.

"The marijuana industry is male-dominated, and dudes love to look at hot chicks," said Ngaio Bealum, Sacramento publisher of a marijuana lifestyle magazine called West Coast Cannabis.

And this, my friends, is yet more evidence that medical marijuana and compassionate care nonsense is 10% about legitimate treatment for health problems and 90% about schmokin' some weed.

In more ridiculousness, you too can try to be a "420 Nurse". Aka, Pot Pinup.
h/t: @Dirk57

Share

76 responses so far

Jurors convict K2/Spice Synthetic Cannabis Seller Under Analog Provision

Sep 12 2011 Published by under Cannabis

Following up* on the case of Eric Srack who was prosecuted for selling a synthetic cannabis product containing the cannabimimetic compound JWH-081. The Salina Journal reports:

Jurors found Eric W. Srack guilty Tuesday morning of three felony counts of sale, delivery or distribution of JWH-081, an analog of an illegal substance.

As you will recall, this particular compound was not one of the ones listed (JWH-018, JWH-073, JWH-200, CP-47,497, and cannabicyclohexanol) ) on the recent scheduling action by the DEA.

You will also recall that this whole blossoming retail market in cannabimimetic products showed quite clearly that the Federal Analog Law, despite having an "OR" between its two key provisions (acts like, looks like) was in fact being interpreted as having an "AND" between these two provisions in case law. The above mentioned compounds were clearly endocannabinoid CB1 receptor agonists, therefore they "act like" the Schedule I drug Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol. They did not however look structurally like THC. So it appeared to be the case in summer-fall 2010 that DEA's "watching and evaluating" language was the same as saying "Yup, these are not currently illegal folks, go nuts!".

Putting at least one of the JWH-xxx compounds on the Schedule, however, had the potential to support the "AND" interpretation of the Federal Analog Act language. All that matters going forward from here is the case law.

This is the first successful conviction that I've heard of. If it holds up, it is a highly significant turning point for the legal status of these cannabimimetic, synthetic marijuana products.

__
*hmm, actually that may be one of the posts I've failed to recover from Sb.

Share

5 responses so far

CPDD Annual Meeting 2011!!!!!111111!!!!!

Did I mention I enjoy learning more about the neurobiological and behavioral effects of recreational drugs as well as the development and treatment of addictions?

The College on Problems of Drug Dependence will be holding their annual meeting in Hollywood Florida this upcoming week. I've been going through the Itinerary Planner and Program Book to get a preview. There are a few presentations that touch on topics that we've blogged about here at the DrugMonkey blog, including

-treating the hyponatremia associated with MDMA-induced medical emergency

-vaccination against drug abuse

-exercise as a potential therapy for, or antidote against, stimulant drug addiction

-JWH-018 and other synthetic cannabinoid constituents of Spice/K2 and similar "incense" products

-some preclinical studies on mephedrone / 4-methylmethcathinone

-presentations from the DEA on scheduling actions that are in progress

I'm certainly looking forward to seeing a lot of interesting new data over the next week.

Share

3 responses so far

In the event all the discussion of representation is boring you...

Mar 17 2011 Published by under Cannabis, Drug Abuse Science

we're talking about cannabimimetic "incense" or "potpourri" products and the Analog provision of the Controlled Substances Act over at Scienceblogs.

Share

No responses yet

DrugFacts 2010 Repost: Comparing Cannabis and Nicotine Withdrawal

Nov 08 2010 Published by under Cannabis, Drug Abuse Science, Nicotine

This is Drug Facts Week, an effort of NIDA to promote understanding of the effects of recreational drugs. I have a little bit of interest in such things. Unfortunately, I've been a bit busy and will continue to be so this week. So I thought I would get at least partially in the game with a series of re-posts. This post originally went up at Scienceblogs.com on April 29, 2008.


For some reason many people are in denial about cannabis dependence and wish to assert that there is no such thing, or if there is, it is somehow of lesser importance than is dependence on other substances of abuse. There are many ways to assess importance of course. What gets me going, however, are the assertions about cannabis abuse and dependence that are informed by anecdote and personal experience with a handful of users instead of an understanding of the available evidence.
To provide a little context for todays' post, I took MarkH of denialism blog to task for his expression of what I viewed as standard cannabis science denialism a fair while ago. In a comment following his post, MarkH specifically identified nicotine withdrawal as being worse than cannabis withdrawal. This is the perfect setup since there are two recent papers which set out explicitly to test this hypothesis. Let us see what they found, shall we?

Continue Reading »

Share

12 responses so far

Exploring the arguments for California's marijuana legalization initiative

Oct 19 2010 Published by under Cannabis, General Politics


BikeMonkey Guest Post
The KPBS public broadcast station has been working on an exploration of Proposition 19, the ballot initiative to legalize marijuana for recreational purposes. This will be on the tee vee October 19. Nice to finally see some journalistic effort. The Prop 19 initiative has been unbelievably absent from the public airwaves, given the topic.

There was a teaser interview on the radio and I picked up a couple of interesting points.

The number of people in the CA state prison system for marijuana charges that would be impacted by Prop 19 amount to 0.8% of the total population. This is true for three large County jail systems as well.

The numbers of these individuals in prison have been dropping over the past decade.

Be wary of claims of arrest costs- advocates like to amortize total police department costs across all "arrests". Law officer points out that most marijuana arrests that would be affected by Prop 19 are not even booked- they are arrested, cited and released instead of being taken down to the police office. This is a substantial difference in per-arrest cost.

The RAND Corporation study was mentioned- if you haven't seen it, their report [pdf] shows that claims of the proponents that this will significantly affect the big political bugaboo of "Mexican drug cartels" is overblown. Way overblown.

Of 140 surveyed elected local officials (mayors, city council members, etc), 41 would go on record as opposed to Prop 19. Nobody else would provide a pro or con response.

The Obama Administration is firmly opposed to Prop 19.

Attorney General Eric Holder...says the Justice Department strongly opposes California's Proposition 19 and remains firmly committed to enforcing the federal Controlled Substances Act in all states.

He made the comments in a letter to former chiefs of the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration. The Associated Press obtained a copy of the letter, dated Wednesday.

"We will vigorously enforce the CSA against those individuals and organizations that possess, manufacture or distribute marijuana for recreational use, even if such activities are permitted under state law," Holder wrote.

Share

No responses yet

Spice Gold Spirit, JWH-018 and your local neighborhood cigar shop

Aug 02 2010 Published by under Cannabis, Medicine and Law, Pharmacology

You may have heard a bit on your local news or perhaps read a piece in your local paper about quasi-legal synthetic marijuana products being sold in your local head shop as "incense". They come under a variety of brand names of which Spice and K2 may be most familiar. Very likely, the media bit you have seen was from some local politician or other trying to make some political hay over his or her concerns that this incense is ruining the lives of the constituency. All that hysteria for incense? Something else must be afoot, you are thinking...and you are quite correct.

Abel Pharmboy had a very good description of the reason people are willing to pay $60 (USD) for about 3 grams of plant material. Continue Reading »

Share

18 responses so far

Synthetic marijuana, K2, spice, JWH-018 searches..phew

May 05 2010 Published by under Cannabis, Drug Abuse Science

The world wide web can be a random thing at times and so it is hard to make much out of a tiny pinhole of a window. Still, something really unique in my experience is the unbelievably sustained drumbeat of Google search hits which land on my post of Feb 17, 2010 entitled:

Synthetic marijuana, K2, Spice, JWH-018 and, you guessed it, dependence


Most of the time one of my blog posts enjoys traffic for a day or two and thereafter rapidly subsides into obscurity. I've never had, until now, a post that just keeps ticking away with a steady stream of daily hits from the Google like this one.
I've just looked at the past thousand or so hits that arrived at the blog via search word. Half of them are for this post on synthetic marijuana. This is atypical, as usually we see a much broader range of search terms landing on a variety of prior posts.
Where the search terms are elaborated, the major interests seem to be in side effects (generically), whether it is bad for you, how to make synthetic marijuana and whether a person can be tested for prior use of these items.
Anyway, like I said this is barely even a pinhole view. It would be an error to overinterpret. But it sure does represent a divergence from our usual experiences here at the blog.
Update: Abel Pharmboy reports he's seeing the same thing on his post: What's the buzz?: Synthetic marijuana, K2, Spice, JWH-018

Share

No responses yet

#proofwaltdisneysmokedpot

Apr 30 2010 Published by under Ask DrugMonkey, Cannabis

I made the idle observation on Twitter yesterday that someone had found this blog by searching for the string "proof walt disney smoked pot". My initial read:

search words finding the blog: "proof walt disney smoked pot". Really people? Really?

Apparently some folks are amused by this concept.

Share

No responses yet

Happy 420 Dudes!

Apr 20 2010 Published by under Cannabis

Just 'cause you know I love you all pot heads....
Cannabis Archive
Hyperemesis
Withdrawal
The Pot Potency data
doc420

Share

No responses yet

« Newer posts Older posts »